Failure to Protect: Reach Up is Not Meeting Kids’ Basic Needs

Vermont’s safety net program for families living below the poverty line hasn’t kept up with the cost of living.

Reach Up is Vermont’s cash assistance program for very low-income families facing significant barriers to employment. Funded by a combination of federal Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) block grant and state funds, Reach Up’s purpose is two-fold: to support adults in moving toward sustainable employment while providing for the basic needs of their children.

Reach Up family grants are frozen in time

Our safety net programs should act as a failsafe for Vermonters, at the very least, stopping them from falling below what is required for subsistence. Reach Up grants to families are well below this, having not seen a cost of living increase in since 2004. In today’s dollars they provide only 34-35% of what’s needed to cover the most basic human needs.

Keeping families in a state of deprivation takes their attention away from what matters

To allow families to struggle in deep poverty is not only an affront to human dignity, it undermines our collective wellbeing and prosperity as a state. Reach Up’s meager level of support makes it harder for the adults on the program to meet their goals, because so much of their energy is directed toward just surviving. Research shows that when people’s minds are in a constant state of stress and scarcity, their cognition is compromised. The fight for daily survival exacts a “bandwidth tax” on brain functioning, and focuses people on short-term needs.1

Child poverty takes a heavy human and economic toll

The stress of living in poverty increases the likelihood that families will come in contact with the child protection system.2 Research shows that kids who grow up in a state of deprivation don’t do as well as their peers in affluent families, and even small increases in family income can improve outcomes.3 Economic hardship is the most common source of toxic stress for children in Vermont, and the current Reach Up benefit level keeps child participants in deep poverty while their adult caregivers strive to overcome barriers to employment.

Equity Lens


Federal welfare reform was motived by deeply entrenched racism and sexism and has done little to reduce child poverty.

An equity analysis of poverty recognizes that income inequality is a structural phenomenon that intentionally privileges certain populations and disadvantages others. But the welfare reform law from 1996 emphasized personal responsibility and incentivized caseload reductions independent of the economic realities facing marginalized groups like women and black, indigenous, and other people of color (BIPOC).

Systemic income inequality is toxic for kids. A recent UNICEF report found that the U.S. ranked 26th
on the list of 29 developed countries surveyed on the well-being of children, the only rich country in the bottom third of rankings. 4

Social transfers play an important role in mitigating income inequality and child poverty in many developed countries. The US stands alone among rich countries in neglectingthe rights of children to have their basic human needs met.

FY 2020 Budget Request

  • Increase base grants to levels that provide for basic needs. An increase of $1 million would boost the average family grant by $25 - not a lot, but enough to make a small difference.

  • Eliminate the $115 penalty assessed on families that include an adult with disabilities receiving Social Security Insurance (SSI). These adults are not counted in the family size calculation in determining the Reach Up grant, so their SSI income should not factor either. Disabilities are both a cause and consequence of living in poverty. People with disabilities experience poverty at much higher rates than those without. This penalty exacerbates inequity and should be repealed.

Basic needs vs grant.png

Reach Up Coalition Members

  • Disability Rights Vermont

  • Hunger Free Vermont

  • Public Assets Institute

  • Vermont Affordable Housing Coalition

  • Vermont Early Childhood Advocacy Alliance

  • Vermont Legal Aid

  • Vermont Low Income Advocacy Council

  • Vermont Network Against Domestic and Sexual Violence

  • Vermont Parent Child Center Network

  • Voices for Vermont’s Children

1 Schilbach, F., et al (2016). The Psychological Lives of the Poor. The American Economic Review, 106(5), 435-440.
2 Sedlak AJ, et al. (2010) Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-4): Report to Congress.
3 Brooks-Gunn, J. , & Duncan, G. (1997) The Effects of Poverty on Children. The Future of Children, Vol.7 No.2.
4 UNICEF Office of Research (2013). ‘Child Well-being in Rich Countries:A comparative overview’, Innocenti Report Card 11, UNICEF Office ofResearch, Florence.